A Senior Administrator, #ClimateChange/SDGs Activist,Social Media Strategist and a Humanitarian
Thursday, January 30, 2020
Kaburu Anthony: It’s not too late to reform the Democratic Republi...
Kaburu Anthony: It’s not too late to reform the Democratic Republi...: Opposition leader Félix Tshisekedi was declared the winner of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) presidential elections held in late ...
It’s not too late to reform the Democratic Republic of Congo crisis
Opposition leader Félix Tshisekedi was declared the winner
of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) presidential elections held in late
December 2018 and was inaugurated in January 2019. The transfer of power
from former President Joseph Kabila, who ruled for eighteen years and had
delayed elections multiple times, marked the first peaceful transfer of power
in the DRC’s history. However, election results have since been questioned.
Tshisekedi inherited a number of crises across the
DRC, including an Ebola outbreak in the east and ongoing violence across
the country, particularly in the Ituri, Kasai, and Kivu regions.
More than one hundred armed groups, such as the Ugandan Allied
Democratic Forces, are believed to operate in the eastern region of the DRC.
Despite the presence of more than sixteen thousand UN
peacekeepers, these groups continue to terrorize communities and control weakly
governed areas. Millions of civilians have been forced to flee the fighting:
the United Nations estimates there are currently 4.5 million internally
displaced persons in the DRC, and more than 800,000 DRC refugees in
other nations.
Background
The origins of the current violence in the DRC are
in the massive refugee crisis and spillover from the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
After Hutu génocidaires fled to eastern DRC and formed armed groups,
opposing Tutsi and other opportunistic rebel groups arose. The Congolese
government was unable to control and defeat the various armed groups, some of
which directly threatened populations in neighboring countries, and war
eventually broke out.
From 1998 to 2003, government forces supported by Angola,
Namibia, and Zimbabwe fought rebels backed by Rwanda and Uganda in what is
known as the Second Congo War. While estimates vary greatly, the death
toll may have reached over three million people. Despite a peace deal in
2002 and the formation of a transitional government in 2003, ongoing
violence perpetrated by armed groups against civilians in the eastern region
has continued, largely due to poor governance, weak institutions, and rampant
corruption.
One of the most prominent rebel groups to emerge in the
aftermath of the war was known as the March 23 Movement (M23), made
up primarily of ethnic Tutsis who were allegedly supported by the Rwandan
government. M23 rebelled against the Congolese government for supposedly
reneging on a peace deal signed in 2009. The UN Security Council authorized an
offensive brigade under the mandate of the UN Organization Stabilization
Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO) to support the DRC state army in its fight
against M23. The Congolese army and UN peacekeepers defeated the group in 2013,
but other armed groups have since emerged.
The country’s massive resource wealth—estimated to
include $24 trillion of untapped mineral resources—also fuels violence. The
mineral trade provides financial means for groups to operate and buy arms.
The United States passed legislation in 2010 to reduce the purchase of “conflict
minerals” and prevent the funding of armed militias, but complex
supply chains in the DRC mineral sale business have made it difficult for companies
that purchase resources from secondhand buyers to obtain certification. As
a result, multinational companies have stopped buying minerals from the
DRC altogether, putting many miners out of work and even driving some to join
armed groups to gain a source of livelihood.
My Proposal Plan for
DRC
The 15-year plan I propose for DRC comprises seven pillars
of development, with the private sector driving growth and international and
diaspora expertise tapped as needed. In its first phase, the program must aim
at advancing human capital, through education, health, and nutrition; creating
opportunity and a level playing field for all, including Congolese women, who
suffer not only legal discrimination, but one of the world’s highest rates of
sexual and gender-based violence; promoting peace, security, rule of law, and
democracy by restructuring the army and police and building strong democratic
institutions and transparent practices; mobilizing domestic resources through
transparent, effective tax collection and anticorruption measures; and
supporting a responsible domestic private sector backed by functioning public
administration and the rule of law. These initial pillars would lay the
foundation for establishing strong institutions that President Barack Obama has
often emphasized in his African policy as opposed to dictatorial strongmen who
are to blame for the current state of affairs.
The second phase of the plan should endeavor to create
opportunities for the people by taking on large-scale, labor-intensive
infrastructure projects to create jobs as well as desperately needed enablers
of trade and growth; boosting and accelerating local industrialization to
refine and process minerals and mechanize farming, livestock and fisheries;
promoting sustainable forest management; and supporting service sectors
including tourism; and finally identifying and tapping domestic and regional
market synergies.
What will this plan cost? I estimate about $800 billion over
15 years, in domestic resources, bilateral and multilateral aid, and foreign
direct investment. It will also require a wholesale rethinking of development
strategy and governance, with transparency a top priority. Executed wisely, it
could turn one of the world’s poorest economies into a driver of African
growth.
Economies most often succeed or fail based on the caliber
and integrity of political leaders and governance structures. Good governance,
rule of law, transparent management of natural resources, and honest, efficient
tax collection should allow the state to develop an annual budget of at least
$72 billion, lifting GDP per capita to $15,000 in a decade and a half.
Proverbial wisdom, repeated recently only in irony, says
that “what’s impossible isn’t Congolese.” Bitter experience has taught too many
of my compatriots quite the opposite. But we know from recent experience that
great progress is possible, even in the poorest, most fragile corners of the
world—progress that conveys prosperity and security not only for individual
economies but, in this era of fast-moving global threats, for us all.
Refining and implementing this new Marshall Plan is where
the country’s transformational work should begin to create conditions for a
sustainable development beyond the usual cosmetic reforms. This plan can be a
big step toward stabilizing and promoting development of one of the most
important countries in Africa
Finally, the current #DRC crisis is catastrophic for Africa.
Weak governance and the prevalence of many armed groups have subjected
Congolese civilians to widespread rape and sexual violence, massive human
rights violations, and extreme poverty.
The solution is political one, and it must be resolved
peacefully through dialogue but what is now desperately need is not deployment
of more troops to the region, but increased capacity for diplomatic work, and
emergency humanitarian relief assistance for people who were forced to flee.
It is a call for the Africa Union and International
Community to renew their efforts to address the source of the conflict. Continued
violence in the DRC may eventually spill over into Burundi, Rwanda, and Uganda.
#My15YearPlan4DRC #PeaceandStability
#SDG16 #SustainableCommunities #PeaceBuilding #SDGS #MakeCongoGreatAgain
Tuesday, January 7, 2020
Kaburu Anthony: Health challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa
Kaburu Anthony: Health challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sub-Saharan Africa is often viewed as a region of extremes, with both tremendous resources and enduring difficulties. In recent years, dema...
Health challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa is often viewed as a region of extremes,
with both tremendous resources and enduring difficulties. In recent years,
demand for those resources has stoked strong economic growth but that growth
has played out amid well-documented—and daunting—challenges: conflict, poverty,
and the twin scourges of HIV and AIDS, Ebola to name just a few. A deeper look
at what is occurring in Africa today reveals a more complex—and
hopeful—picture.
Globally, sub-Saharan Africa bears the greatest burden
of disease. Despite these low ratings, health care is not a primary policy
concern for people in these countries. Instead, sub-Saharan Africans cite jobs
as a top priority, followed by improving agriculture and tackling corruption.
In recent decades, global attention to the harrowing
state of health in sub-Saharan Africa has increased dramatically. Funding to
combat the major health problems there has reached unprecedented levels, and
marked improvements have been made. In Zanzibar (Tanzania), for example,
malaria deaths have been cut substantially. And in Uganda, maternal mortality
has dropped by more than half.
These efforts have also produced important results. In a
growing number of African nations, the catastrophic rate of new adult HIV
infections appears to be falling: according to the UNAIDS (the Joint United
Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS), the number of new infections in sub-Saharan
Africa declined by approximately 24 percent in 2019. Similarly, tuberculosis
rates are slowly decreasing across the region. Malaria incidence and mortality
are declining not only in Zanzibar but also in several other parts of Africa.
But while health aid has increased to sub-Saharan Africa
from high-income countries, residents there do not view health care as a top
policy priority. Instead, 31 percent of people picked new jobs as their top
concern, and 21 percent picked improving agriculture. Tackling corruption was
next at 14.4 percent. Education and health care were chosen by 13.6 percent and
13.5 percent, respectively. Providing electricity was picked by only 6.3
percent.
The region continues to face profound health challenges.
Tanzania, for example, has made progress against childhood mortality, yet one
in every nine Tanzanian children still dies before age five. And the country’s
maternal mortality rate remains stubbornly high, despite almost three-quarters
of these deaths being preventable.
Of course, just because people in sub-Saharan Africa do not
see health care as the highest priority does not mean that aid agencies are
incorrect to prioritize it, People in the region may be poorly informed or
after centuries of high morbidity, they may not believe the government or
anyone else is capable of providing meaningful relief. But even if they are
well informed, it might also be the case that aid agencies believe -- correctly
or not -- that they are more effective at saving lives than at generating
economic growth.
Basic solutions
Basic solutions
A third of sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) population comprises
persons aged 10-24 years. These youth are growing up in a context marked by pervasive
poverty, limited educational opportunities, high HIV/AIDS prevalence,
widespread conflict, and weak social controls.
For the sub-Saharan
African region to take advantage of the dividends of a growing youthful
population, the region must raise her capacity to generate rigorous scientific
evidence to inform policies and programs designed to improve the health and
wellbeing of her young people. This means that governments should not only
encourage and fund research on young people’s health and development but also
actively use evidence generated to inform policies and programs geared towards
the youth.
To address the rising burden of diseases, improve health
systems, and attain better health, the continent needs strong public health
research capacity. Countries with a weak population and public health research
capacity have limited capacity to identify and prioritize their health needs
and, hence, are unable to develop and implement effective interventions to
promote well-being.
Strengthened capacity to understand the determinants of
health in relation to gender, ethnicity, cohorts, and communities among
different African populations holds the key to effective interventions to
improve health outcomes and health systems in the region. It is now generally
accepted that Africa's progress depends on her ‘ability to understand,
interpret, select, adapt, use, transmit, diffuse, produce, and commercialize
scientific and technological knowledge in ways appropriate to [her] culture,
aspirations, and level of development approaches to science and technology in
development.
Ensuring healthy lives and promoting the well-being for all
at all ages is essential to sustainable development. Significant strides have
been made in increasing life expectancy and reducing some of the common killers
associated with child and maternal mortality.
Major progress has been made on increasing access to clean
water and sanitation, reducing malaria, tuberculosis, polio and the spread of
HIV/AIDS. However, many more efforts are needed to fully eradicate a wide range
of diseases and address many different persistent and emerging health issues.
The private sector plays a significant role in spearheading
innovations across Africa. In addition to providing capital investment,
businesses can share strategic logistics and marketing know-how, source from
local distributors and assess the scalability of projects –all key measures in
ensuring lasting social and economic value. The private sector also drives
other stakeholders to advocate for sound policies, tailored solutions, improved
infrastructure and relevant research.
Instilling a culture of innovation is a promising way to
propel the whole of Africa in its efforts to eradicate diseases and improve
health. All health organizations should pioneer solutions customized to the
unique context and culture of communities across Africa. Nevertheless, more
support is needed, particularly from governments, to encourage future
entrepreneurs to seek to invent new solutions with the potential to create a
lasting impact on the health of hard to reach communities.
The Ebola crisis has also highlighted the urgent need for national and
international investment in the affected countries in order to strengthen the
health and surveillance systems, as one of the major priorities. If we are to win the current war on Ebola, we
must employ unconventional approaches, even ones that might be considered
controversial. The fact is, people who are poor and neglected are more
susceptible to infectious diseases and distrustful of authority. Distrust of
authority, civil war and Ebola are a recipe for disaster even with the most
costly response and medical counter measures.
This epidemic is in a
truly frightening phase and shows no sign of stopping anytime soon; we can
expect and should plan for more cases in DRC and neighboring countries. The
Ebola crisis has shown that, in global health, turning a blind eye may
result much more expensive than acting on time. That moment, unfortunately,
has arrived.
Solving Africa’s health and development problems takes more
than statements of good intention, empty promises of aid — or movie stars’
adoption of African children. But there definitely are ways to solve them. In
fact, many diseases affecting children and adults can be addressed with minimal
resources — if they are used strategically.
Furthermore, to ensure solutions are scalable, sustainable
and impactful, governments, businesses, academics and NGOs must all bring their
respective strengths to the table, combining local and international capacities
in advocacy, fundraising, business expertise, scientific knowledge and data,
holistic and integrated solutions can be developed, resulting in a larger
positive impact – a win-win situation for all involved.
Researchers need to develop innovative ways to reach out to
national authorities, policy makers and key stakeholders who will use their
evidence in their operations in the continent. Strengthened research capacity to understand
the social determinants of health among different African populations is key to
addressing the drivers of poor health and developing interventions to improve
health outcomes and health systems in the region.
Finally, Funding agencies and governments should support
research on typically under-researched areas of people’s health in SSA
including mental health, injuries, and non-communicable diseases and encourage
future entrepreneurs to seek to invent new solutions with the potential to
create a lasting impact on the health of hard to reach communities #SDG3
#HealthforAll #UniversalHealthCare #StrengtheningHealth #HealthyLives #SDGS
#Wellbeing
Kaburu Anthony: Education is the way to gender equality in Africa
Kaburu Anthony: Education is the way to gender equality in Africa: Access to and completion of a quality basic education is widely accepted as a fundamental human right and a key way for citizens to gain va...
Education is the way to gender equality in Africa
Access to and completion of a quality basic education is
widely accepted as a fundamental human right and a key way for citizens to gain
valued knowledge, including learning the skills and attitudes necessary to lead
an active, engaged and productive life. Over the past 25+ years, the global
community has sought to prioritize educational development as a key strategy
for national development and economic growth.
However, given the importance of education for development,
it is deeply concerning that despite the progress achieved over the years in
terms of expanding enrollment, particularly at the primary/basic levels, so
many children and youth remain out of school around the world, the majority of
whom are girls.
Moreover, beyond the
challenge of ensuring that all children have the opportunity to attend school
is the matter of how schooling is experienced differently by boys and girls and
what this means for gender equality in terms of retention, attainment, quality
learning and educational outcomes.
The need to address gender-based inequalities that limit
girls’ schooling opportunities, experiences and outcomes is supported by evidence
demonstrating a wide range of valuable individual, social and economic benefits
associated with girls’ and women’s education. For example, for every year of
primary schooling she receives, a girl’s earning potential increases by 10 to
20%, and for every year of secondary education the increase is between 15 and
25%.
As further quantified evidence of the extrinsic value of
girls’ education, a child born to a literate mother is 50% more likely to
survive past the age of five, and educated mothers are more than twice as
likely to send their children to school (according to UNICEF).
Beyond the extrinsic values associated with girls’ education
in terms of how much more an educated woman can do for her family, community
and country are the intrinsic values of education as a human right and what it
means to the individual person in terms of their own human and personal
development.
The purpose of this short piece is to provide a snapshot of
contemporary gender and education issues/trends and the policy options
available to governments and their partners that can support the elimination of
gender inequalities in schooling in the sub-Saharan and North African regions.
Despite differences in socioeconomic, cultural, religious
and political contexts, gender inequality in education is a recognized global
phenomenon and as such represents a shared challenge amongst nations of the
world. Before discussing contemporary gender (in) equality trends and
challenges and the available policy responses, I first offer a brief conceptual
discussion of key analytical and measurement terms.
Distinguishing
between “sex” and “gender” difference
To start with, the concept of gender is not synonymous with
“sex” or “girls” or “women”. When we speak of sex differences, we are referring
to the biological differences between males and females; when we speak of
gender differences, we are referring to the socially defined and enacted
differences between women and men in terms of characteristics, capabilities,
roles, etc.
We learn our gender roles through socialization practices in
our families, communities and schools. Over the past 15 years or so there has
been a movement in the scholarly literature to better understand the nature and
significance of various masculinities or femininities in relation to
educational access, retention/attainment, learning and outcomes.
The concept of gender stereotype refers to attitudes and
beliefs about the characteristics associated with, and the activities
appropriate to, men or women in a given community or society. Gender bias
occurs when people make assumptions or stereotypes about behaviours, abilities
or preferences based on gender. For example, gender-based assumptions
concerning girls’ future roles as wives and mothers can shape what is learned
in school and to what level.
Yet, despite the deeply entrenched and taken-for-granted
nature of gender, recognizing that gender roles and gender identities are
socially rooted and performed brings us to the powerful conclusion that gender
norms and values can and do change. The significance of this realization cannot
be over-stated as it suggests that we have the power to address gender-based
inequalities in schools and through schooling.
Distinguishing
between “gender parity” and “gender equality”
While the concepts of gender equality and gender equity are
often used interchangeably in international and national development frameworks
and policy, gender parity has dominated as a key indicator of progress towards
gender equality in education.
A key theme in current scholarship and policy advocacy
concerns the limits of pursuing gender parity – or the achievement of “equal
participation of girls and boys in all forms of education based on their
proportion in the relevant age-groups in the population” – and instead suggests
the need to re-calibrate our compasses to focus more on gender equality and
equity and less on gender parity.
Gender equality, emphasizing sameness, refers to the
provision of equal conditions, treatment and opportunity for both men and women
to realize their full potential, whereas gender equity emphasizes difference
and refers to the process of being fair to men and women.
What gender equity is and how to achieve it involves value
judgments, understanding of the different experiences, positions and needs of
different women and men in a society, and the recognition that treating
individuals or groups equitably sometimes means treating them differently.
Gender (in) equality
in education: trends and challenges
Notwithstanding emergent concerns with issues of boys’
education, promoting girls’ education has been a global policy priority because
this has and continues to be the area where the need is greatest. The
sub-Saharan African region, despite showing a gender parity index (GPI)
increase from 0.85 to 0.92 between 1999 and 2012, remains the furthest from
achieving gender parity at this level.
Close to three quarters of the countries with fewer than 90
girls for every 100 boys enrolled in primary education were in the sub-Saharan
Africa region. The situation is worse at the secondary level, with the average
GPI only increasing from 0.82 to 0.84 between 1999-2012.
And again, almost three quarters of the countries considered
to be far from achieving gender parity at the secondary level are in the SSA
region. Indeed, worrying trends in terms of girls’ (and some boys’) transition
to and completion of secondary education is the main focus of gender equality
in education research and policy advocacy
The challenges to achieving gender equality in education
have been well documented over the past decades and continue to persist in the
contemporary moment. In terms of challenges related to demand-side factors, we
know that poverty, labour market structures/employment opportunities, gendered
socio-cultural expectations and practices (e.g., early marriage/pregnancy,
domestic work burdens) and security concerns continue to represent some of the
greatest barriers to girls’ (and some boys’) education.
With respect to
supply-side factors of gender (in)equalities in education, we know that school
and classroom cultures, teachers, teaching and learning materials, the physical
condition of schools, and the overall policy landscape (e.g., presence of
equity policies, anti-sexual harassment policies, etc.), all shape the degree
to which gender equality and equity is enacted (or otherwise) in school
systems.
Linking school and
society, or supply- and demand-side barriers, gender-based violence (GBV) has
become an urgent policy concern over the past decade:
“Gender-based violence [GBV] may take a psychological,
physical and/or sexual form and relates to the enforcing or upholding of power
imbalances between the sexes… It [GBV] acts of sexual, physical or psychological
violence inflicted on children in and around schools because of stereotypes and
roles or norms attributed to or expected of them because of their sex or
gendered identity. It also refers to the differences between girls’ and boys’
experience of and vulnerabilities to violence.
GBV manifests itself in a range of school setting and
interactions, including but not limited to teachers sexually harassing and/or
assaulting students, students harassing or assaulting other students, victim
blaming, early marriage/pregnancy, and punishing individuals for failing to
conform to gender role expectations. GBV has a high social and economic price
in terms of parents not wanting to send their children to school, in that it
often leads to dropping out of school, causes psychological trauma with
long-term and unpredictable consequences, in addition to pregnancy, disease and
injury.
Policy responses for
the promotion and achievement of gender equality in education
There are five main principles or patterns underpinning successful
gender equality in education approaches8.
·
First, partnership approaches that bring
together governments, donors and civil society are key.
·
Second, is the need for enacting multiple and
multi-sectoral interventions to address the complex demand and supply-side
challenges to girls’ education and gender equality in education more broadly.
·
Third, there is a need for strategic and
evidence-based policy advocacy and support for continued research, monitoring
and evaluation.
·
Fourth, there must be commitment on the part of
governments and their partners to the promotion of gender equality in
education.
·
Fifth, governments, with the support of donors
and civil society, must ensure adequate and sustainable education financing.
Research suggests that successful policies address change
and drive action in three main interconnected areas: interventions,
institutions and interactions. The following offers a brief discussion of
exemplars of policy responses associated with each of the preceding action
areas.
Interventions
The concept of “interventions” refers to specific policy
levers that can be used to promote access to education, addressing both demand-
and supply-side challenges to gender equality in schools. The building of more
schools and the recruitment of more teachers, including more women teachers to
act as positive role models, is one relatively straightforward way governments
can support educational access.
Limiting the distance
that children ‒ girls in particular ‒ have to travel to get to school can go a
long way to addressing the security concerns of parents. Innovative
interventions have included pairing volunteers from the community with children
to walk with them to and from school to ensure their safety.
Reforms aimed at improving the quality of education are also
an important part of stimulating demand for schooling. Such reforms can include
the improvement of school facilities (e.g., ensuring access to clean water and
secure and separate toilet facilities) and the provision of adequate and effective
teaching and learning materials.
Gender-responsive teacher training, both in-service and
pre-service, is also seen as an effective way to support gender equitable
teaching and learning in the long term, and as such represents a valuable
policy lever available to governments and an area for serious investment.
An excellent resource for governments and an example of good
practice is the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE)’s Gender
Responsive School model, “where the academic, social and physical environments
of the school and local community recognize the specific needs of both boys and
girls”. For example, the innovative model supports the “development of
gender‐responsive pedagogy, which focuses on lesson planning, language use,
classroom interactions, and the role of management in supporting
gender-responsive approaches in schools. It targets practical skills as well as
the training of school management teams.
Promoting the establishment of school-based clubs (e.g.,
school governance/student councils, girls’ and boys’ clubs, science clubs,
etc.) and other venues for participation and the development of self-esteem and
leadership skills is an effective component of inclusive and gender-responsive
learning environments. A further supply-side intervention to support gender
equality in education is curriculum reform and textbook revision to remove
gender bias and promote gender awareness.
To address constraints related to poverty and
marginalization ‒ two of the most serious challenges to gender equality in
education – several demand-side interventions have proven quite successful in
getting more girls (and marginalized boys) into school.
·
First, the elimination of school fees has been
critically important.
·
Second, many governments offer financial subsidies
to help off-set the direct and indirect costs of schooling for the most
vulnerable groups, particularly girls.
Conditional cash transfer (CCT) incentive schemes are a more
recent policy innovation that have been used with considerable success in a
number of sectors, including education, to change behaviour and promote gender
equality in education. Additionally, the documented success of school-based
feeding programs and reproductive health education (as well as other
child-health supportive programming) support the claim that multiple and
multi-sectoral interventions are necessary to address educational challenges
related to poverty.
Institutions
Enacting and promoting gender equality in education involves
institutional reform and transformation. Gender mainstreaming and
gender-responsive budgeting represent two of the most important policy
approaches that governments have adopted to demonstrate their commitment to the
realization of gender equality in education and beyond. Institutional reform also
covers the need to develop strong monitoring, accountability and enforcement
mechanisms for successful policy implementation and development.
The collection of sufficient and appropriate data concerning
participation, gender relations, context, experience, learning and outcomes is
critical here, and a commitment to the collection and analysis of
sex-disaggregated data is of paramount importance for monitoring progress and
identifying challenges to the achievement of gender equality in education.
Effective enforcement
mechanisms are also needed to ensure, among other things, the implementation of
gender equality policies, including anti-sexual harassment policies and others
aimed at combating gender-based violence in schools.
Interactions
More recent research and advocacy has sought to highlight
the importance of engaging all stakeholders – government, school
administrators, teachers, parents and students – in gender equality in
education policy processes, a critical component of which is dialogue and
debate.
Value differences associated with varying socio-economic,
political and cultural contexts are a reality and such differences need to be
recognized and engaged in order for societies to develop the policies that best
reflect the needs and aspirations of the communities they serve. Thus,
reforming policy processes to create genuine spaces for dialogue and debate
represents a further critical component of gender equality in education
strategies.
In addition to the creation and support of Parent-Teacher
Associations, School Management Committees and the like, national and regional
forums must be established where actors can come together to take stock, assess
challenges, identify assets and plan accordingly for taking the necessary
actions to achieve gender equality in and through education.
Given that education is a human right and a cornerstone of
human and national socio-economic development, promoting gender equity in and
through education ought to remain a policy priority for governments, donors and
civil society in the 21st century. I hope that the trends, challenges and
strategies discussed above can help support and guide effective gender equity
policy and practice going forward. #SupportGirlChild
#GirlEducation #UniversalEducation #GenderEquality #GenderEquity
#EqualOpporturnities #EndGenderDiscrimination #SDG4 #SDG5
Kaburu Anthony: Hunger in Africa is widening every minute
Kaburu Anthony: Hunger in Africa is widening every minute: Over the last 30 years, significant progress has been made towards reducing poverty and global hunger. However, one in every eight people l...
Hunger in Africa is widening every minute
Over the last 30 years, significant progress has been made
towards reducing poverty and global hunger. However, one in every eight people
living in developing countries still suffers from chronic undernourishment. In
2019, more than 245 million people were affected by acute food insecurity in Africa
alone and 850 million worldwide.
Africa could have one billion undernourished, malnourished
and hungry children and young people by 2050 if current levels continue
unabated. More than half of African countries are currently off course to meet
targets required in the African regional nutrition strategy (2015-2025). Just
nine countries will meet the target of reducing stunting by 40% by 2025.
Despite extensive global economic growth in recent decades,
including in some of the poorest countries in Africa, millions of people remain
locked in a vicious cycle of hunger and poverty. Poverty means parents can't
feed their families with enough nutritious food, living children malnourished.
Malnutrition leads to irreversibly stunted development and shorter, less
productive lives. Less productive lives mean no escape from poverty.
Conflict and the climate crisis have exacerbated child
hunger in Africa, with three out of four of the continent’s stunted children
under the age of five living in countries turned into war zones. In areas
experiencing protracted conflicts, the rate of undernourishment in children is
about two to three times higher.
Women and girls, along with children from poor and rural
backgrounds, suffer the most from hunger. In some countries, stunting rates are
twice as high among rural children as among their urban counterparts
Annually, child hunger costs Ethiopia 16.5% of its GDP. The
rate for Rwanda is 11.5%. For every dollar invested in reducing stunting, there
is a return of about $22 (£17) in Chad, $21 in Senegal, and $17 in Niger and
Uganda, and if the investment is made early in the child’s life, the return
rates can be even higher: up to $85 in Nigeria, $80 in Sudan and $60 in Kenya.
A child dies every three seconds globally due to food
deprivation – 10,000 children every day – but although figures show an
improvement in child hunger at a global level, it is getting worse in some
parts of Africa, where the problem is largely a question of political
will.
Nine out of 10 African children do not meet the criteria for
minimum acceptable diet outlined by the World Health Organization, and two out
of five don’t eat meals regularly. Liberia, Congo and Chad are at the bottom of
the chart when it comes to children aged six to 23 months receiving sufficient
and diverse food with a healthy frequency. They are followed by Zimbabwe,
Guinea-Bissau, Gambia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Many African countries are even becoming more food insecure. The sustainable development goal with respect to hunger eradication with respect to Africa has been a failure. Low levels of education especially in women are key perpetuators of poor nutrition practices in this Region of the World. Children under five are the most affected. Male children tend to have better health status than females in certain communities.
The problem is further aggravated by adverse climatic
conditions, with droughts and floods in some areas. Government policy has not
been very successful most of the time, because most governments fail to
consider this as a serious issue, and rescue projects from the western world
are vertical and do not consider socio cultural realities of target
implementation sites. In Africa, funds accorded for fighting malnutrition are
often embezzled.
·
Improving government policy, increasing
political will and application of community adapted strategies in tackling this
issue is fundamental. It should be recognized, not only as a public health
issue, but as a fundamental human right especially for children to eat.
Starting life disadvantaged with adverse consequences from malnutrition (ill
health, mental retardation, high malnutrition related morbidity and mortality
resulting especially from under-five deaths) is a neglected but serious
developmental hindrance to Sub - Saharan Africa.
·
The fight against corruption must cease to be
lip service but actually get effective.
·
The use of modern agricultural techniques to
increase food production is very essential. Provision or subsidization of the
ministries of Agriculture to provide fertilizers, use genetically modified
foods to resist adverse weather conditions and improve yield could be possible
solutions to be investigated.
·
Improvement of the transport system to give
access to locals to sell their local produce to raise incomes for their
families is important.
·
Base Line surveys to determine and understand
sociocultural peculiarities of each community during implementation of
particular programs are vital. Avoidance of vertical programs could be of great
help.
·
The ministry of environments of countries must
engage in programs to protect the environment which continues to be degrading.
Feasible and sustainable irrigation programs should be scaled up especially in
drought affected regions.
·
The solution to this problem of malnutrition in
developing countries entails a multisectorial approach with well defined and
achievable goals. The ministries of health, education, agricultural,
environment, universities and research organizations and other non-governmental
organizations or international donors must work together if any tangible
outcomes are expected.
Further research involving the potential acceptability of
new agricultural technologies, modern farming methods and genetically modified
foods in a Sub Saharan African context should be undertaken. Understanding the
socio cultural peculiarities of the milieu is fundamental.
It might be difficult and unproductive implementing some health promotion programs, especially when they are very vertical and culturally inadapted. Implication of the community representatives in the programs from the early planning stages could be key determinants of program ownership, acceptability and sustainability. #EndingHunger #ZeroHunger #SDGS #ClimateChangeActions #SDGS #Sustainability #ResourceManagement #Humanity #FoodSecurity #NutritionforAll
Friday, January 3, 2020
Kaburu Anthony: Why we must end wasteful consumption and productio...
Kaburu Anthony: Why we must end wasteful consumption and productio...: By the end of the century there could be an extra three billion mouths to feed, a period in which substantial changes are anticipated in th...
Why we must end wasteful consumption and production
By the end of the century there could be an extra three
billion mouths to feed, a period in which substantial changes are anticipated
in the wealth, calorific intake and dietary preferences of people in developing
countries, at the same time as changing demographic trends in developed
countries will have implications for food production and security.
Such a projection presents mankind with wide ranging social,
economic, environmental and political issues that need to be addressed today to
ensure a sustainable future for all. One key issue is how to produce more food
in a world of finite resources.
Today, we produce about four billion metric tonnes of food
per annum. Yet due to poor practices in harvesting, storage and transportation,
as well as market and consumer wastage, it is estimated that 30–50% (or 1.2–2
billion tonnes) of all food produced never reaches a human stomach.
Furthermore, this figure does not reflect the fact that
large amounts of land, energy, fertilisers and water have also been lost in the
production of foodstuffs which simply end up as waste. This level of wastage is
a tragedy that cannot continue if we are to overcome increasing pressures on
land, water and energy usage and succeed in the challenge of sustainably
meeting our future food demands.
In less-developed countries, such as those of sub-Saharan
Africa and South-East Asia, wastage tends to occur primarily at the
farmer-producer end of the supply chain. Inefficient harvesting, inadequate
local transportation and poor infrastructure mean that produce is frequently
handled inappropriately and stored under unsuitable farm site conditions.
As the development level of a country increases, so the food
loss problem generally moves further up the supply chain with deficiencies in
regional and national infrastructure having the largest impact.
In mature, fully developed countries such as the UK,
more-efficient farming practices and better transport, storage and processing
facilities ensure that a larger proportion of the food produced reaches markets
and consumers. However, characteristics associated with modern consumer culture
mean produce is often wasted through retail and customer behaviour.
Major supermarkets, in meeting consumer expectations, will
often reject entire crops of perfectly edible fruit and vegetables at the farm
because they do not meet exacting marketing standards for their physical
characteristics, such as size and appearance. Globally, retailers generate 1.6
million tonnes of food waste annually in this way.
Of the produce that does appear in the supermarket, commonly
used sales promotions frequently encourage customers to purchase excessive
quantities which, in the case of perishable foodstuffs, inevitably generates
wastage in the home. Overall between 30% and 50% of what has been bought in
developed countries is thrown away by the purchaser.
Recommendations for addressing food waste
Rising population combined with improved nutrition standards
and shifting dietary preferences will exert pressure for increases in global
food supply, with increasing pressure on finite resources of land, energy and
water. Yet the report highlights that engineers, scientists and
agriculturalists do have the knowledge, tools and systems that will assist in
achieving productivity increases and states that there is the potential to
provide 60–100% more food by simply eliminating losses, while simultaneously
freeing up land, energy and water resources for other uses.
The growth in the world’s population that is projected to
take place over the coming decades will present a great range of developmental
challenges, including for food security and environmental sustainability.
Governments should consider and implement as necessary the ways highlighted by
the report to addressing food waste, which must play a role in helping
meet the challenges of ensuring food security for the 9 billion world
population projected before 2050, which may exceed 10 billion by the end of the
century.
Developed countries must take drastic measures to overcome
the considerable waste at the market and consumer end of the food chain due to
retail and customer behaviour. Developing countries must be supported to
develop more efficient harvesting and local transport networks to address the
wastage occurring at the farmer-producer end of the supply chain. These
measures help to achieve food security and also advance environmental
sustainability, given the wasteful use of resources and unnecessary pressures
on the environment associated the production of foodstuffs which only go to
waste.
The vast majority of world population growth over coming
decades is projected to take place in developing countries, where food and
water shortages are most prevalent. Yet an estimated 222 million women in
developing countries want to avoid pregnancy but have an unmet need for modern
contraception. Urgent investment in voluntary family planning services that
respect and protect rights is required to address this vast unmet need, to
ensure that women are able to makes choices about their own fertility.
This strategy offers a proven and cost effective strategy
for slowing population growth and helping achieve other development goals, and
must be pursued alongside efforts to address unsustainable and inequitable
patterns of production and consumption, including in the current food
production and distribution systems.
The 2030 Agenda is based on the assumption that with
technological progress, resulting in enhanced efficiency, society will be able to
overcome this contradiction—a view that is popular in policy circles but not
well supported by science. The solution to this dilemma lies rather in a
restructuring of the economic and social arrangements that require endless
growth in consumption.
Only with such a transformation will it be possible to
reconcile objectives that under current arrangements seem to be in conflict.
The SDG 12 can help achieving a range of objectives across the 2030 Agenda,
but, as it is currently formulated, it is unlikely to inspire the kind of
transformation needed for achieving systems of sustainable consumption and
production.
One of the great values of the 2030 Agenda is that it
creates forums at various levels of society for dialogue on what kind of
development is desirable and how society can make this happen. The scientific
community has a critical role to play in these processes and we hope that many
researchers will be actively engaged. Such involvement in public discourse is
especially important in the current era of growing disregard for truth and
reason.
To improve well-being everywhere, we need to find ways of
using resources efficiently, generating less and enabling a more equitable
standard of living worldwide. More than the other Goals, sustainable
consumption and production patterns require changes in society and culture --
changes in how we think.
We all need to encourage the redesign of resource life
cycles so that all materials are reused, with no waste left to be sent to
landfills. Zero-waste strategy is all about creating a low-carbon, resource
efficient, resilient and socially inclusive economy that respects the diversity
of ecosystems and promotes biodiversity, which is reflected in all seventeen of
the Sustainable Development Goals.
Governments should address food waste, and play a role in
helping meet the challenges of ensuring food security for the 9 billion world
population projected before 2050, which may exceed 10 billion by the end of the
century. It’s time to refocus our global efforts on ending the cycle of
hunger and poverty once and for all #ZeroWaste #SustainableConsumption #SDG12
#SustainableProduction #ZeroHunger #FoodSecurity #sdg2
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Kaburu Anthony: More than 70 million people around the world have ...
Kaburu Anthony: More than 70 million people around the world have ...: As we commence 2020, let’s remember that more than 70 million people around the world have fled their homes. Each day thousands more follow...
More than 70 million people around the world have fled their homes. Each day thousands more follow
As we commence
2020, let’s remember that more than 70 million people around the world have
fled their homes. Each day thousands more follow, but refugees are not numbers,
they are human beings like you and I, except they have seen unspeakable horror
and have experienced unthinkable tragedy and hardship.
We live in a world where violence, war and crime control
ninety percent of our lives and we have been forced and reduced to enjoy only
ten percent and most of this lawlessness is perpetuated by people who think
that they can change the world by using violence.
The violence and wars we are witnessing in the world leaves a trail of destruction and it is forcing people to flee their homes and seek shelter elsewhere and most of the times this people seeking refuge are faced with worst challenges and there is nothing worse in life than seeking help and the person you thought you can get help from turns out to be your worst nightmare worse than even the one you are running away from.
Most people think that people flee their homes because they
want to get the money from UN which is not the case because this people are
fleeing because of conflict and other human challenges they are facing and we
need to help this people get over this problems.
The system protecting the rights of refugees in the world is broken and world leaders should come up with a comprehensive legal framework that can protect all this people seeking asylum. Refugees seeking asylum are faced with serious transportation challenges and some have been smuggled into different countries in the world and some of this refugees are not lucky because others drown in the ocean crossing to other countries and this mode of transportation has caused us innocent lives of innocent people seeking help and others are killed and others are kidnapped and others are forced to become sex slaves and others become prisoners of war.
Another challenge facing refugees is the difficulty in speaking the same language of the host community or country and also learning English or any other local language and this is a challenge people seeking help are faced with and it is hard to get help when you can’t understand what the other person is saying.
Getting a place to sleep is another challenge refugee’s face and for them to secure a decent housing is a challenge and they rely on our help to accommodate them.
Giving this refugees a place to stay can help them overcome
the trauma of the horrible things they have faced from where they come from and
what they are still currently facing and this can help them recover quickly and
this people expect us to be human enough and welcome them to our homes. Where
they come from there is a problem which forced them to flee and where they are
coming to, they see hope of a better life for them and their children.
Raising children in such a situation is a challenge because your children depend on you as a parent and you as a parent doesn’t have any option to provide for your family and accessing humanitarian services or securing work in a foreign land may seem practically impossible especially in countries where humanitarian aid is restricted, human rights violation is high, freedom of movement is restricted, unstable government and where cultural or traditional believes deny a specific group of people a right to be employed.
Being there for a person in need is good but sometimes the help we are providing might not appropriate to the person we are helping because of, traditional believes, customs, cultural barriers and many more reasons and when we are offering to help someone in need, we should put into consideration, if what we are offering is appropriate to the person we are helping and also we must always remember that aid must and should be based on need only.
Forceful transfer of population is a human right abuse and forcing people to flee to a distant place not suited to their way of life cause a lot of human rights abuses and during this period families are separated and uniting families and protecting young children can be a challenge especially if there is no specific mode of tracing lost or missing people.
Providing aid is good for a short term plan and helping refugees rebuild their livelihoods and empowering survivors can have a long term impact and this will benefit them and reduce over dependence on aid thus this will help them in restoring their freedom, dignity and independence. I was watching CNN recently and the situation in the world is getting worse every day from Syria to south Sudan, from Nigeria to Somalia, from Yemen to Iran and other different countries.
We blame terrorist for killing people which is true but we forget that we are also killing people by denying them food and also by denying them shelter and by refusing to sign those important document they need to seek asylum and also by denying them a safe passage and also by kicking them out of our countries because they are not our citizens or because we are not related to them and many more reasons.
We can all save lives by opening our doors and offer to help, and when we open the doors, it may seem like nothing but, by just opening the doors we can save lives. Please open the doors and welcome refugees, they need our help and we are their hope and no matter how little our help may seem, it can save a life. We can support the refugees through UN refugee agency or international federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent society.
Words cannot express my gratitude and appreciation to all the human rights organizations, volunteers, donors, individuals and countries, who put the lives of other people first, before theirs and who work day and night to ensure the safety of all refugees and all I can say is thank you, for your commitment to give those In need a chance to live in dignity by restoring hope and providing them with tools and resources they require to rebuild their lives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)